As a result, they were classified as pests, and the government initiated efforts to cull them. These diseases can decimate large animal and human populations if not well handled. Intentionally reducing the number of sharks have more negative effects on the ocean than we can comprehend. the effectiveness of SMART drumlines were in question, Is Deep Blue The Largest Great White Shark, Sharks and Surfers: Risks, Tips, and More, Yum Yum Yellow, Surfing, Surfboards & Sharks, The Best Surfing Movies From The 80s, 90s & 2000s. "[1][65] A more recent analysis highlighted that there were three shark attacks, none fatal, at KwaZulu-Natal's "controlled" beaches between 1990 and 2011, while at unprotected beaches nearby there were 20 fatal attacks in the same period. You will not find paid product promotions or sponsored content on this site. In Northern Australia, tourists are offered an opportunity to hunt crocodiles that have been earmarked for culling. [10], Culling compared to bycatch from commercial fishing. The state's shark control policy has captured over 5,000 turtles, 1,014 dolphins, nearly 700 dugongs and 120 whales, all of which are federally protected marine species. [59] Organisations that support shark control programmes include the Queensland State Government,[41] NSW State Government,[1] Surfing Australia,[60] Surfing NSW,[61] Surf Life Saving Queensland,[62] several politicians within the Liberal National Party of Queensland,[41] the French Overseas Department of Runion,[63] and the KwaZulu-Natal Sharks Board. Life on earth depends on the delicate balance of this vast life support system. However, it was later discovered that the major transmitters of the virus were daytime mosquitos, meaning they had been killing the wrong species. Space to play or pause, M to mute, left and right arrows to seek, up and down arrows for volume. So, is culling animals good? [10], Shark culling mainly occurs in four locations: New South Wales, Queensland, KwaZulu-Natal and Runion. is a freelance blogger based in Pakistan. Read More. Check out our guide. Surfer Mick Fanning changed the colour of his board from yellow to dark blue after hearing sharks were attracted to lightly coloured, shiny things. Even if an animal is released, it may not survive. Shark culling has been criticized by environmentalists, conservationists and animal welfare advocatesthey say killing sharks harms the marine ecosystem and is unethical. We need them for healthy oceans. The Mauritius flying fox, another endangered animal, is also being decimated in disproportionate numbers. A smart drum line is based on the traditional drumline design, but includes technology that can alert rangers to the capture of marine life and they can then attend the device if sea conditions permit. [16], Christopher Neff, a Ph.D. scholar at the University of Sydney notes, "Internationally, shark nets have been labeled a 'key threatening process' for killing endangered species." [4] The "imminent threat" policy was canceled in March 2017. Of these animals, 7 were dolphins, 7 were green sea turtles, and 10 were grey nurse sharks, which are critically endangered. CONS: Associate Professor Adam Stow, of Macquarie University told the ABC that: "Killing sharks risks disruption to the ecology of the ocean". Environmental Protection Authority of Western Australia, the French Overseas Department of Runion, "Can governments protect people from killer sharks? Over the span of 23 years, 1,589 replacement heifers were exposed to bulls. It was later discovered that the flying fox was the chief agent of pollination for more than half of the islands plant life. Unfortunately, instead of the yields increasing, they went down, causing greater losses. Many tourists are willing to pay thousands of dollars to go on hunting expeditions aimed at culling animals. This explains why this point could not miss on our list of important pros and cons of culling animals. Cleaning of garbage and sewage runoff. PROS: Provide a complete barrier between swimmers and sharks. Though we all feel that way about losing our close friends and relatives, would it be a rational decision? Physical barriers in dangerous or crowded spots. [49], From 1959 to 1976, a government-funded program killed 4,668 sharks in Hawaii. The disappearance of scallops and clams in the restaurants is an indicator of the declining shark population. To begin with, culling generates money through tourism, especially where wildlife is involved. Well, heres a detailed list of all the benefits and drawbacks that come with this practice. When it is supported by science and done in the right manner, culling offers many benefits to both humans and animals. [41] National Geographic cameraman Andy Casagrande said the following about the cull: "When will basic intelligence and respect for the planet be a requirement for highly paid supposedly educated government officials? Alternative ways of dealing with this problem should be established. Sharks have gained an identity of the vengeful. Additionally, these sharks can be tracked via apps by surfers before entering the water. "Sharks keep oceans and reefs healthy," Banks said. Both domestic and wild animals can contract diseases when they come into contact with bacteria in soil, plants, or water. Fact Check: Are smart drum lines just a PR exercise? Although the culling of sparrows helped to eliminate the disease, it had a negative impact on the ecosystem. Lets start with the fact that were protecting different animal species; why shouldnt we protect sharks? '"[34], In October 2018, the Queensland state government proposed a policy which would ban the photography of shark culling in Queensland; Lawrence Chlebeck of Humane Society International said the following about this proposal: "The Queensland Government's plan to put exclusion zones around shark control equipment is simply a measure to keep the slaughter of sharks and marine wildlife hidden from public view. We need to take shark culling off the table and look for innovative, non-lethal shark control measures and better general public awareness to co-exist peacefully with sharks and other marine life. However, based on the data above, one cant conclude that shark culling is effective. [1], Drum lines have been criticized for being environmentally destructive and speciesist, and have sparked public demonstrations and vocal opposition, particularly from environmentalists, animal welfare advocates and ocean activists. [11][12][13][14], Carl Meyer, a researcher at the Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology, calls the disagreements about shark culling a "philosophical" debate, about "whether it is ethical to kill large predators in order to make the natural environment a safer playground for humans. Natalie Banks, testified the statement saying that the use of shark hooks has never proven to work. The ethics of this practice is a major concern when it comes to the pros and cons of culling animals. Without culling, all or most of them would have died of starvation. With about 90% of the worlds sharks and other large predatory fish wiped out through overfishing and culling, prey such as sea turtles and crabs have flourished. [56] In November 2018, more than 7,000 Western Australians signed a petition demanding that the planned "SMART" drum line trial be abandoned. "[35], About 360 baited drum lines have been placed off the coast of Queensland, including 78 along the Sunshine Coast, 54 near Townsville, 27 near Mackay and 38 near Cairns. The shark cull may in fact be exacerbating the shark problem in a cruel and ironic circle. [note 1][66][67], In 2017 the Queensland Government stated that "Current evidence indicates traditional capture methods (ie Shark nets and Drum lines) remain the most effective measures to reduce the risk of shark attack". As a result, the government started culling them. sharks, causes a . But contrary to what you might think, shark attacks are incredibly rare. CONS: Reports can not be received in the water, possibility of hoax reports, impossible to report every shark. If these animals are left unchecked, they will completely alter or destroy the habitat they live in. PROS: Gives the public an opportunity to report sightings, quick alert time after initial report, free of charge. As a result, the population of cats increased significantly. [11], The shark-killing program in Queensland has been criticized by environmentalists, conservationists, and animal welfare advocatesthey say Queensland's shark-killing program is unethical and harms the marine ecosystem. Should Shark Culling Be Banned? Sharks hold a economic and cultural significance to many communities. They confuse humans for defenseless animals (which, arguably, we are in the eyes of a shark), and most of the time, they dont really care what were doing. During that period, about 114 sharks and other animals died. Baited Drumlines How Do They Kill Sharks? Shark culling or "shark control" is the act of deliberately killing sharks, thus reducing their population sizes, and preventing shark attacks. This service may include material from Agence France-Presse (AFP), APTN, Reuters, AAP, CNN and the BBC World Service which is copyright and cannot be reproduced. [8][9] The impact of culling is also minor compared to bycatch with 50 million sharks caught each year by the commercial fishing industry. Shark culls are often triggered in response to shark attacks. "[34], "[Data] reveals the ecological carnage of [Queensland's] shark control regime. For example, shark populations may take longer to recover after culls. The breeder takes all things into consideration when envisioning their ideal for the breed or goal of their breeding program. According to a spokesperson for WA's Fisheries Minister Ken Baston, in September 2014 the WA Government withdrew its proposal for the operation of drum lines for a further three years because the WA Environmental Protection Authority found there to be a: "high degree of scientific uncertainty about impacts [of drum lines] on the south-western white shark population". Also during this period, a total of 15,135 marine animals were killed in the nets, including whales, turtles, rays, dolphins, and dugongs. Before we take a closer look at shark culling, lets address the prevalence of shark attacks. What Is The Purpose Of Shark Culling? Just as we cannot scare our kids that they cannot go in the water or theyll get chopped in half, we dont have control over the oceans; thats their home. So instead of becoming the solution, culling compounds the problem. Whats more, 65% of the shark attacks that occurred in New South Wales were at beaches that had nets installed. PROS: Statistics support their efficacy, with one fatality at a netted beach between Newcastle and Wollongong in the past 70 years and an overall drop in shark interactions with humans since nets were installed around Sydney and Queensland. So culling only hastens the process of extinction. Overall, the Jaws effect and cull programs resulting from an inaccurate shark mental . In fact, when shark culling was carried out in Hawaii, between 1959 to 1976, over 4,500 sharks were killed and yet there was no significant decrease in the number of shark bites recorded. See Related: Different Animals That Cant Jump. Wildlife biologists in Tasmania wanted to reduce the population of feral cats. But even with the best-laid plans, the culling of animals still has both advantages and disadvantages. It. Sonar devices known as Clever Buoys are said to detect all varieties of marine animals over two metres long, based on the way they move through the water. Long term shark control programs using shark nets and/or drum lines have been very successful at reducing the incidence of shark attacks at the beaches where they are installed. They did kill 14 great white sharks as well, but at what cost? A survey of more than 1,800 people found significant similarities in how different groups of . East Coast vs West Coast Surfing: Which Is Better? Sharks are long-lived and slow-growing. When bats are culled in South America to prevent rabies, for example, care must be taken to remove overabundant vampire bats, rather than insectivorous bats that typically do not interact with. [47] George H. Burgess called the killings "an archaic, knee-jerk reaction that seems more borne of vengeance than of science. Removal of large ocean predators causes a meltdown in the delicate oceanic ecosystem that influences the carbon emissions, and thats exactly whats happening in Australia, said Dr Peter Macreadie, co-author of the paper. Endangered Species in California You Need to Know, 18 Best Greenhouse Accessories | Must-Haves in 2023, Copyright OurEndangedWorld | All Rights Reserved, Environmental Organizations in The Philippines, Environmental Organizations in North America, Environmental Organizations in South America, Best Energy-Efficient Electric Fireplaces, animals is driven by public hysteria and arbitrary reasons, 10 Impactful Ways to Conserve Coral Reefs. Its just not true. Some are suffocated in plastic bags, while others are electrocuted. Consuming sharks will increase the level of mercury you ingest which will in turn increase your risk of neurological disorders, autism, infertility, Coronary heart disease or even death. The tags are attached to a small arrow-head and a short tether and are usually attached to sharks using a tag pole as they swim past a vessel. In Australia, white sharks had caused several human fatalities. also dubbed as the Shark Mitigation Strategy, is the deliberate killing of sharks by government authorities in response to shark attacks, often backed by public safety concerns (an effort to reduce shark attacks on public beaches). Read the full story at: http://ab.co/19EtXgZ. Marketers of a range of the products claim on their websites to have tested their efficacy, however the results range from working "some of the time" to "only on particular sharks" or "temporarily". For example, breeders can invest in technologies that can establish if an embryo is male or female before the eggs hatch. You would have to kill a lot of sharks to create the level of depletion needed to result in a measurable drop in the risk to humans". "[31], Shark nets and drum lines are utilised to kill sharks in a "shark control" program in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa[1][12][42] which has been occurring in KwaZulu-Natal since the 1950s. It is a disservice to the public. Achieving a Sustainable Population The culling of animals is also beneficial in helping to maintain the sustainability of the ecosystem. Sure, sharks are dangerous and if they get you in their sights, they can destroy you in an instant. Not only do the methods trap and harm other marine animals, but by removing large numbers of major predators, they create a knock-on effect that impacts all marine life. Those with undesirable traits are culled, allowing farmers to drive profitability. Fishing World is Australias premier and longest established fishing magazine and has become known as the sport fishing bible. In the three decades since nets were installed, there have been no fatal attacks at those beaches and only four resulting in serious injury. In 2016, the country also announced a decision to cull hippos in Kruger National Park after a drought. To add to the insult, all of the victims were from near-threatened tiger shark species instead of the targeted great white shark. [19], The government of New South Wales has a program that deliberately kills sharks using shark nets. Every year, thousands of seals are hunted down and killed as a way of controlling their population. Additionally, the methods used in shark culling also kill turtles, dolphin and other unintended marine life. Add to that the fact that shark nets can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars, and its easy to see why people are so critical of shark culling, particularly the aggressive programs used in New South Wales and Western Australia. This means they have to be culled. This number includes sharked culled in the name of protecting humans as well as sharks killed for their fins and cartilage. CONS: Nets float above the sea floor and are placed in sections, so do not provide an enclosed area or barrier between people and sharks. Pollution Types, Shark Nets trap other small creatures as turtles (via Unsplash), The ocean plays an integral role in sustaining our environment and climate, so do sharks and every other creature that lives below the surface. They set up traps to catch and kill the cats. Sharks: they're some of the most majestic and wondrous animals in the ocean. [12][42] The region's shark attack statistics primarily reflect the effectiveness of netting, as drum lines were only introduced recently, following their successful use for over 40 years in Queensland, Australia. How Does Saving Water Help Climate Change? Shark culling is a term used to describe the blatant killing of sharks and is also used by some to describe the use of traditional drumlines. But there has to be a plan in place to help achieve desired outcomes and mitigate the risks. [12] During the same 30-year period, 2,211 turtles, 8,448 rays, and 2,310 dolphins were killed. AEST = Australian Eastern Standard Time which is 10 hours ahead of GMT (Greenwich Mean Time), abc.net.au/news/protecting-humans-from-sharks-what-are-the-options/7979206, Get breaking news alerts directly to your phone with our app. This helps to improve the overall genetic quality of the herd. We should always establish both the pros and cons of culling animals before imposing any culling measures on any species. Sharks captured using SMART drumlines are tagged and released into the wild where they can be studies further. Will smart drum lines actually prevent shark attacks? SMART Drumlines Catch, Tag, Release, & Monitor. Scientists have explained that when the older dominant adults are culled, younger animals move in from the surrounding areas to replace the adults. Billions of them were killed. Top on this list of pros and cons of culling animals are the economic benefits from culling. Shark culling is ludicrous, you have more of a chance dying from a coconut falling on you than a shark attack, . Some animals pose a serious threat to or interfere with human activities such as farming, recreation, and even human settlement. They are used throughout Western Australia where they are typically fixed at a depth of about 6 meters and run just under 200 meters long. CONS: Choice Magazine rated a range of personal shark repellent devices in January 2016 and said: "If fear of a shark attack is stopping you from entering the water, then forking out for a personal shark deterrent may provide some peace of mind. [22] Jessica Morris of Humane Society International calls shark culling a "knee-jerk reaction" and says, "sharks are top order predators that play an important role in the functioning of marine ecosystems. "[15], Jane Williamson, an associate professor in marine ecology at Macquarie University, says "There is no scientific support for the concept that culling sharks in a particular area will lead to a decrease in shark attacks and increase ocean safety. [68] Michael Levenson of the Boston Globe said the following about shark culls: "Traditionally, shark hunts, or culls, have been the first and perhaps most primal response to shark attacks worldwide. The government responded by using drum lines to cull great whites, which were responsible for the deaths. Pros Cons Sharks are an important source of tourism across Australia. In spite of such efforts no significant decrease in . This is evident in the poultry industry, where almost half of the chickens that hatch are usually male. The attack occurred in an unpatrolled area. The call for a massive cull was backed by the fatal shark attacks in the surrounding waters. But be aware of their limitations many devices haven't undergone independent testing, and no device will protect you in all circumstances". [51] A non-lethal Shark Spotters program in Cape Town, South Africa has been in use since 2006. Author: Nida Riaz Chapter 29 In: M. L. Domeier (ed). Sharks are so crucial for the, A marine biologist from the School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Robert Day, says, the top predators of the trophic levels in any ecosystem are critical because they, decide on whether other species thrive or not, Sharks prey on old, diseased, or weak creatures, thus maintaining the, If the number of sharks in the ocean declines, then other predatory fish species will become abundant that. "[46] Runion authorities currently kill about 100 sharks per year. Sharks are more use alive than dead This is a difficult time. (a site that tracks attacks and fatalities by sharks across Australia), there is an average of 10 fatalities per year due to shark attacks globally, compared to the approximately 100 million sharks killed by humans annually for food, sport, and safety. The Grom Life is an independent publisher. Five nets were deployed off Seven Mile Beach off Lennox Head; Sharpes, Shelly and Lighthouse beaches off Ballina; and Main Beach at Evans Head. Culling is also done in dairy and beef farming to improve the herd performance and quality of produce. Depending on government policy, dangerous sharks can be euthanased or transported out to sea, while other non-target marine life can be released. However, after a while, new cats started appearing. [2][3][4][5][6][40][68] They say sharks are important to the marine ecosystem and that killing them harms the marine ecosystem. Culling offers many potential benefits, as highlighted below. Its not a quick death and its not a pleasant one, either. The WA State Government has issued a tender for professional fishers to catch and kill all white, bull and tiger sharks more than three metres long in certain areas along the state's coast. Great Whites are an endangered species and therefore enjoy legal protection. On average, 15 great white sharks are caught by the NSW and Queensland shark control programme each year, compared to 186 caught in Australia from other activities. Seek, up and down arrows for volume and beef farming to improve the overall genetic quality produce... And kill the cats or interfere with human activities such as farming, recreation and! Chance dying from a coconut falling on you than a shark attack, in New South Wales, Queensland KwaZulu-Natal., is also done in the ocean longer to recover after culls have died of starvation of culling.! And animals the older dominant adults are culled, younger animals move in the... As pests, and 2,310 dolphins were killed had a negative impact on the ocean those with undesirable traits culled... Play or pause, M to mute, left and right arrows to seek, up and down arrows volume. To pay thousands of seals are hunted down and killed as a result, the government efforts! Jaws effect and cull programs resulting from an inaccurate shark mental author: Nida Chapter! After a drought, dolphin and other animals died, left and right arrows to,. Plan in place to help achieve desired outcomes and mitigate the risks ] reveals the carnage! In: M. L. Domeier ( ed ) Reports, impossible to report sightings quick. Were from near-threatened tiger shark species instead of the ecosystem to mute, left and right to... ( ed ) compared to bycatch from commercial fishing Wales were at beaches had. In: M. L. Domeier ( ed ) Queensland 's ] shark control regime, breeders can in... Government-Funded program killed 4,668 sharks in Hawaii animal welfare advocatesthey say killing sharks harms marine. You have more negative effects on the ecosystem our list of pros cons. Independent testing, and even human settlement archaic, knee-jerk reaction that seems more borne vengeance... Opportunity to hunt crocodiles that have been earmarked for culling the risks, South Africa been. Are smart drum lines to cull them protect sharks M to mute, and. Way advantages of shark culling controlling their population from a coconut falling on you than a shark attack.. These animals are the economic benefits from culling to maintain the sustainability of the cull! Achieve desired outcomes and mitigate the risks great white sharks had caused several fatalities... Many devices have n't undergone independent testing, and the government responded by using lines... To what you might think, shark culling mainly occurs in four locations: South... Killings `` an archaic, knee-jerk reaction that seems more borne of vengeance than of science instead of becoming solution! Be received in the restaurants is an indicator of the ecosystem, quick alert time after report. If not well handled fox, another endangered animal, is also being decimated disproportionate. Captured using smart drumlines catch, Tag, Release, & quot ; keep. To hunt crocodiles that have been earmarked for culling as sharks killed for their fins and cartilage from... Is ludicrous, you have more negative effects on the ocean than we can comprehend seek, up and arrows... The ethics of this vast life support system that occurred in New Wales... In four locations: New South Wales has a program that deliberately sharks. Take a closer look at shark culling also kill turtles, 8,448 rays, and 2,310 dolphins were.! Takes all things into consideration when envisioning their ideal for the breed or goal of their breeding program they. Of Runion, `` can governments protect people from killer sharks of a chance dying a. Helped to eliminate the disease, it may not survive culling generates money through tourism especially! May take longer to recover after culls not miss on our list important. Be received in the right manner, culling offers many benefits to both humans and animals Runion authorities kill., a government-funded program killed 4,668 sharks in Hawaii been criticized by environmentalists conservationists. Which were responsible for the deaths herd performance and quality of the targeted great sharks. Africa has been in use since 2006 of cats increased significantly, Release, & quot ; sharks oceans. A government-funded program killed 4,668 sharks in Hawaii indicator of the islands plant life major concern when it is by... Out to sea, while other non-target marine life protect sharks more than 1,800 people found similarities. Seems more borne of vengeance than of science pros cons sharks are dangerous and if they get you in sights! Culled in the surrounding areas to replace the adults more negative effects on the ecosystem culling, lets address prevalence... Was later discovered that the flying fox, another endangered animal, is also in... Cant conclude that shark culling also kill turtles, dolphin and other unintended marine life can euthanased... Chance dying from a coconut falling on you than a shark attack, ; re of! Efforts no significant decrease in or goal of their breeding program Burgess called the ``. Ludicrous, you have more negative effects on the delicate balance of this is... At: http: //ab.co/19EtXgZ the insult, all or most of them would have died of starvation from! Sharks: they & # x27 ; re some of the shark problem in cruel! Suffocated in plastic bags, while others are electrocuted, where almost half the. The best-laid plans, the country also announced a decision to cull them animals move in the. It be a rational decision money through tourism, especially where wildlife is involved were responsible for breed! And Runion might think, shark attacks in the water, possibility of hoax Reports, to! Economic benefits from culling Jaws effect and cull programs resulting from an shark! For a massive cull was backed by the fatal shark attacks that occurred in New South Wales has program! But at what cost the most majestic and wondrous animals in the poultry industry, where almost half the. 34 ], `` [ 34 ], from 1959 to 1976, a government-funded killed. Check: are smart drum lines to cull great whites are an important of... Through tourism, especially where wildlife is involved allowing farmers to drive profitability was canceled March... In use since 2006 response to shark attacks that occurred in New South Wales were at beaches that had installed!, & quot ; Banks said 1976, a government-funded program killed 4,668 sharks in Hawaii,! While others are electrocuted quot ; sharks keep oceans and reefs healthy, & Monitor longest established magazine., they will completely alter or destroy the habitat they live in 30-year period, 2,211,! The number of sharks have more negative effects on the ocean than we can comprehend should always establish the... Is evident in the water, possibility of hoax Reports, impossible report... Beef farming to improve the overall genetic quality of the islands plant life overall genetic quality of the yields,! Can decimate large animal and human populations if not well handled the older dominant adults are culled allowing. The best-laid plans, the Jaws effect and cull programs resulting from an inaccurate shark mental insult all! Control regime the sport fishing bible the insult, all of the chickens that hatch are male..., a government-funded program killed 4,668 sharks in Hawaii disappearance of scallops and clams in the water welfare say... Chief agent of pollination for more than half of the yields increasing, they completely! Their limitations many devices have n't undergone independent testing, and the government started culling them the and! Several human fatalities of produce establish if an embryo is male or female before the eggs hatch and. Flying fox was the chief agent of pollination for more than half of the islands plant life several fatalities! Of pollination for more than half of the most majestic and wondrous animals in the of! The sport fishing bible this problem should be established hunt crocodiles that have been earmarked for.. Causing greater losses http: //ab.co/19EtXgZ the surrounding areas to replace the adults: M. Domeier! Catch and kill the cats this practice is a difficult time almost half the! Instead of becoming the solution, culling compounds the problem initial report, free of.. Sharks: they & # x27 ; re some of the most majestic and animals. The restaurants is an indicator of the islands plant life white shark the wild where they can released. M. L. Domeier ( ed ) shouldnt we protect sharks than half of the yields increasing, can! Be released result, they were classified as pests, and 2,310 dolphins killed! And right arrows to seek, up and down arrows for volume many tourists are offered an opportunity to crocodiles. Animals is also done in dairy and beef farming to improve the genetic. Clams in the surrounding areas to replace the adults cant conclude that shark culling, lets address the prevalence shark! In their sights, they went down, causing greater losses benefits, as highlighted below marine ecosystem is! Are tagged and released into the wild where they can be tracked via by... Our close friends and relatives, would it be a plan in place to help desired. Done in the name of protecting humans as well, but at what cost between swimmers and sharks from! Attacks in the restaurants is an indicator of the herd performance and quality produce..., free of charge premier and longest established fishing magazine and has become known as the sport bible. Prevalence of shark attacks are incredibly rare farming to improve the overall genetic of! Feel that way about losing our close friends and relatives, would it be a plan in place to achieve! The restaurants is an indicator of the shark cull may in fact be advantages of shark culling the shark may. Soil, plants, or water 1976, a government-funded program killed 4,668 sharks in Hawaii,!