EAGER proposals are not eligible for reconsideration, if declined. Items, however, such as standard wheelchairs, prosthetics, hearing aids, TDD/text-phones, or general readers for the blind would not be supported because the need for them is not specific to the proposed project. The NSF* Current & Pending (C&P) Support document generated from the Current & Pending Tool in ERA is in the process of being updated to mirror the 2022 NSF PAPPG version of the NSF form, which adds two new sections for NSF C&Ps: Overall Objectives and Statement of Potential Overlap.However, the ERA update will not occur until later this Fall. See Chapter IV.D.2.b. Examples include: The total amount of direct costs requested in the budget, to include Lines A through G, must be entered on Line H. Except where specifically identified in an NSF program solicitation, the applicable U.S. Inclusion of additional information beyond that specified within the PAPPG may result in the proposal being returned without review. 159 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<358E8D14B423974EAA819A8B75362784>]/Index[139 31]/Info 138 0 R/Length 101/Prev 214904/Root 140 0 R/Size 170/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream Each proposal must contain a budget for each year of support requested. Such as: Detailed information about the content is available in theProposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide (PAPPG), Chapter, II.D.2.hii (NSF website). Accordingly, for each proposal that proposes to conduct research off-campus or off site, Conformance with Instructions for Proposal Preparation, Deviations from NSF Proposal Preparation and Submission Requirements, Requests for Reasonable and Accessibility Accommodations, Proposal Font, Spacing and Margin Requirements, Authorization to Deviate from NSF Proposal Preparation Requirements, List of Suggested Reviewers or Reviewers Not to Include, Proposal Certifications Provided by the Organization, Certification Provided by Senior Personnel, Submission of Proposals by Former NSF Staff, Page Limitations and Inclusion of Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) within the Project Description, Administrative and Clerical Salaries & Wages Policy, Materials and Supplies (including Costs of Computing Devices), Consultant Services (also referred to as Professional Service Costs), Prohibition on Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment, Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources, Collaborators & Other Affiliations Information, Special Information and Supplementary Documentation, Plans for Data Management and Sharing of the Products of Research, Rationale for Performance of All or Part of the Project Off-campus or Away from Organizational Headquarters, Documentation of Collaborative Arrangements of Significance to the Proposal through Letters of Collaboration, Research in a Location Designated, or Eligible to be Designated, a Registered Historic Place, Research Involving Field Experiments with Genetically Engineered Organisms, Documentation Regarding Research Involving the Use of Human Subjects, Hazardous Materials, Live Vertebrate Animals, or Endangered Species, Special Components in New Proposals or in Requests for Supplemental Funding, Beginning Investigators (applies to proposals submitted to the Biological Sciences Directorate only), Proposals Involving Live Vertebrate Animals, Potential Life Sciences Dual Use Research of Concern (DURC), Projects Requiring High-Performance Computing Resources, Data Infrastructure or Advanced Visualization Resources, Safe and Inclusive Working Environments for Off-Campus or Off-Site Research, EArly-concept Grants for Exploratory Research (EAGER), Research Advanced by Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering (RAISE), Grant Opportunities for Academic Liaison with Industry (GOALI), Facilitation Awards for Scientists and Engineers with Disabilities (FASED), Career Life Balance (CLB) Supplemental Funding Requests. The format of the Biographical Sketch is as follows: (i) *Name: Enter the name of the senior person (Last name, First name, Middle name, including any applicable suffix). publications, data sets, software, patents, and copyrights; In accordance with Section 223(a)(1) of the, Current and Pending (Other) Support includes. The only exceptions to this rule are: (1) when the Program Officers at the relevant Federal agencies have previously agreed to joint review and possible joint funding of the proposal; or (2) proposals for PIs who are beginning investigators (individuals who have not been a PI or co-PI on a Federally funded award with the exception of doctoral dissertation, postdoctoral fellowship or research planning grants). PIs are cautioned, however, that the text must still be readable. See 2 CFR 200.475 for additional information on travel costs. [15] Detailed instructions for submission of confidential budgetary information are available in Research.gov. [10] See Chapter II.F. Costs of publishing the proceedings. The RAISE proposal type must be selected in the proposal preparation module in Research.gov. Human subject payments should be included on line G.6. PATh supports single-PIs and collaborative science groups across science and engineering disciplines to join the cohort of international physical science collaborations who have leveraged the dHTC paradigm for decades. The proposal budget may request costs for professional and consultant services. If the dollar value is not readily ascertainable, reasonable estimates should be provided. While training plans are not required to be included in proposals submitted to NSF, institutions are advised that they are subject to review upon request. The following information must be provided: (a) the NSF award number, amount and period of support; (c) a summary of the results of the completed work, including accomplishments, supported by the award. List names as last name, first name, middle initial, for whom a personal, family, or business relationship would otherwise preclude their service as a reviewer. If any of the following items on the Cover Sheet are applicable to the proposal being submitted, the relevant box(es) must be checked. List names as last name, first name, middle initial, and provide organizational affiliations, if known, for the following: List editorial board, editor-in chief, and co-editors with whom the individual interacts. placement of the individual or research organization in SAM or the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) to alert other agencies. Compensation for time normally spent on research within the term of appointment is deemed to be included within the faculty members regular organizational salary. Each proposal[38] that requests funding to support postdoctoral researchers[39] must upload under "Mentoring Plan" in the supplementary documentation section of Research.gov, a description of the mentoring activities that will be provided for such individuals. Travel outside the areas specified above is considered foreign travel. Costs of translation services, audio visual, webcast, and computer services for recording, transmitting, and transcribing the proceedings. The cognizant Program Officer handling the proposal considers the suggestions and may contact the proposer for further information. (iii) Certification Regarding Flood Hazard Insurance[8]: Two sections of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 USC 4012a and 4106) bar Federal agencies from giving financial assistance for acquisition or construction purposes in any area identified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as having special flood hazards unless the: (1) community in which that area is located participates in the national flood insurance program; and. (iv) The costs are not also recovered as indirect costs. A group travel proposal is encouraged as the primary means of support for travel. The NSF Proposal and Award Policies & Procedures Guide, and the 2011 National Science Board report on Merit Review Criteria outline how broader impacts come from your research: "Broader impacts may be accomplished through the . The goals in identifying and eliminating overlap are to ensure that sufficient and . Prospective discoveries reside at the interfaces of disciplinary boundaries that may not be recognized through traditional review or co-review. In the meantime, for NSF proposals due on or after . Sufficient information must be provided within the 15-page Project Description to enable reviewers to evaluate the: (ii) choice of species and number of animals to be used; (iiii) description of the proposed use of the animals; (iv) exposure of animals to discomfort, pain, or injury; and. Most Center awards are limited to a maximum duration of ten years and are often subject to mid-course external merit review. Funds may be requested to purchase special equipment, modify equipment, or provide services required specifically for the work to be undertaken. Career-Life Balance supplemental funding to existing awards may be requested as described below: Research award recipients may request supplemental funding: To support additional personnel (e.g., a technician or research assistant) to sustain research when the PI, co-PI, or other member of the senior personnel is on family leave for either primary dependent care responsibilities or other direct family considerations; and. Provide a list of the senior persons professional preparation (e.g., education and training), listed in reverse chronological order by start date. %PDF-1.6 % through G.5. The proposing organization may request that salary data on senior personnel not be released to persons outside the Government during the review process. SciENcv - Information can be entered into SciENcv to produce an NSF-compliant PDF and may be saved for use in future submissions. A proposal that includes reference citation(s) that do not specify a URL is not considered to be in violation of NSF proposal preparation guidelines and the proposal will still be reviewed. The Proposal Preparation Checklist (Exhibit II-1) may be used to assist in this review. As this is a primary concern of Federal agencies, please be clear in your explanations. Reference books and periodicals only may be included on the proposal budget if they are specifically allocable to the project being supported by NSF. See Chapter IV.B for additional information. The proposed research should be transformative, beneficial to industry, and further collaboration between the institution of higher education and industrial partners. For fellowship applicants only, also include the start date of the fellowship; and, Location of organization: City, State/Province, Country. The . If the project is to be funded through an award to an international organization or through an individual fellowship award that will support activities at an international organization, NSF will require a statement from the international organization explicitly listing the proposers name and referencing the title of the award to confirm that the activities will be conducted in accordance with all applicable laws in the international country and that the International Guiding Principles for Biomedical Research Involving Animals will be followed. Justification normally occurs through National Academies studies, workshop reports, professional society activities, and other community-based mechanisms, including engineering studies and research projects related to the development of new technologies. The Common Rule defines research as a systematic investigation, including research development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge. A complete listing of NSF programs that require cost sharing is available on the NSF website. Senior personnel who wish to include publications in the products section of the Biographical Sketch that include multiple authors may, at their discretion, choose to list one or more of the authors and then "et al" in lieu of including the complete listing of authors' names. The proposal budget also may request costs for leasing of computer equipment. [31] In accordance with the NSPM-33 Implementation Guidance, senior personnel typically do not include graduate students. Consultants travel costs, including subsistence, may be included. All collaborative proposals must clearly describe the roles to be played by the other organizations, specify the managerial arrangements, and explain the advantages of the multi-organizational effort within the Project Description. Requests for Reasonable and Accessibility Accommodations, Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act, as amended in 2017, 2. If a decision is made to fund the proposal, the cognizant NSF Program Officer will notify the NSF Animal Welfare Officer to initiate negotiation of a PHS-approved Animal Welfare Assurance with OLAW. Note that there is no page limitation for this section of the proposal, though some fields have character limitations for consistency and equity. The guidelines specified above establish the minimum font size requirements; however, PIs are advised that readability is of paramount importance and should take precedence in selection of an appropriate font for use in the proposal. If this application is funded Dr. XYZ will request approval to reduce his/her effort on 5R01AG123456-01 from 4.80 calendar months to 2.40 calendar months. The specific nature, purpose, and need for equipment or assistance should be described in sufficient detail in the proposal to permit evaluation by knowledgeable reviewers. The following sections are required for a collaborative proposal submitted by: See Chapter II.D.2.i for additional guidance on the mentoring and data management plan requirements for collaborative proposals. [50] See Chapter IX.D. See also Chapter V.B of the Antarctic Research solicitation. Expendable materials and supplies necessary for the meeting. NSF funds may not be included or spent for meals or coffee breaks for intramural meetings of an organization or any of its components, including, but not limited to, laboratories, departments, and centers, as a direct cost. The Ideas Lab concept incorporates a "guided creativity" process, thus the use of a facilitator(s) is included, both to guide the creation of interdisciplinary teams and the creative development of ideas, and to ensure that the workshop progresses in a productive manner. (f) Do not submit any personal information in the Current and Pending (Other) support. NSF is not required to provide accommodations that impose an undue hardship on the operation of the organization or that fundamentally alter the nature of its programs or activities. ", Such information also may be included as a separate statement. Proposals may include the participation of a "third partner" such as a National Laboratory or a non-profit organization. to foster harassment-free environments wherever science is conducted, including at NSF-sponsored conferences. Find instructions and blank format pages below. NSF will not tolerate research misconduct in proposing or performing research funded by NSF, reviewing research proposals submitted to NSF, or in reporting research results funded by NSF. The email confirming approval to submit a RAPID proposal must be uploaded by the prospective PI in the Program Officer Concurrence Email section of Research.gov. Off-Campus or Off-Site Research For purposes of this requirement, off-campus or off-site research is defined as data/information/samples being collected off-campus or off-site, such as fieldwork and research activities on vessels and aircraft. Temporary dependent care costs (a dependent is defined in 26 USC 152) above and beyond regular dependent care that will directly result from travel to conferences are allowable costs provided that the costs are: (i) a direct result of the individuals travel for the NSF conference award; (ii) consistent with the recipient's documented travel policy for all employee travel; and. If this application is funded, Dr. Y's effort will be adjusted on R01HL567089-07 to remove the overlap. Person-month information included in current and pending support may differ from the person-months 3729-3733 and 3802. If certification of exemption is provided after submission of the proposal and before the award is issued, the exemption number corresponding to one or more of the exemption categories also must be included in the documentation provided to NSF. The prospective PI will receive an email from the cognizant NSF program officer that specifies whether a full proposal may be submitted. Required fields are marked *. to foster safe and harassment-free environments wherever science is conducted. [32] In accordance with the NSPM-33 Implementation Guidance, a "Foreign government-sponsored talent recruitment program" is defined as an effort organized, managed, or funded by a foreign government, or a foreign government instrumentality or entity, to recruit science and technology professionals or students (regardless of citizenship or national origin, or whether having a full-time or part-time position). Research facilities subject to the Animal Welfare Act using or intending to use live animals in research and who receive Federal funding are required to register the facility with the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), US Department of Agriculture. The physical resources themselves are provided by service providers via separate awards from NSF. Inclusion of additional information beyond that specified below may result in the proposal being returned without review. Allowable items ordinarily will be limited to research equipment and apparatus not already available for the conduct of the work. for additional requirements on issuance of a subaward or consultant arrangement to a foreign organization or a foreign individual. This section of the proposal is used to assess how well qualified the individual, team, or organization is to conduct the proposed activities. Research infrastructure includes major research instrumentation, mid-scale projects and major facilities. The table includes the types of activities to be reported, where such activities must be reported in the proposal, as well as when updates are required in the proposal and award lifecycle. m@ NSF uses the information submitted in the Current and Pending Support section to assess the capacity of the individual to carry out the research as proposed, and to review any potential overlap/duplication with the proposed project. The box for Potential Life Sciences Dual Use Research of Concern must be checked on the Cover Sheet if use of select agents or other enhanced potential pandemic pathogens, as defined by the Policy, are envisioned, and those agents or PPPs are used in ways that lead to enhancement of specific properties specified within the Policy. For research infrastructure projects, the project/performance site should correspond to the physical location of the asset. Program Officers may elect to obtain external reviews to inform their decision. An NSF funding opportunity that includes EAGER proposals will provide specific guidance on submission of Concept Outlines using either email or via ProSPCT. (v) Certification Regarding Organizational Support: The AOR is required to complete a certification that there is organizational support for the proposal as required by Section 526 of the America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010. Your email address will not be published. Other Support. [23] See NSFs Revised Cost Sharing Policy Statement for the Foundations overarching policies on cost sharing. Information must be provided for: Each Current and Pending (Other) Support entry should include: All Harvard individuals who are designated as Key Personnel on an NSF award/subaward are required to report all their research support to NSF via the Current and Pending (Other) Support form, which is required at JIT and with each RPPR if their support has changed since the last submission. Summarize . Federally negotiated indirect cost rate(s) are limited to a de minimis indirect cost rate recovery of 10% of modified total direct costs. However, if no such rate exists, the NSF recipient will fund the foreign subrecipient using the de minimis indirect cost rate recovery of 10% of modified total direct costs. NSF is not responsible or in any way liable for the release of such material. False representations may be subject to prosecution and liability pursuant to, but not limited to, 18 U.S.C. Proposal Budget and Budget Justification: A budget and budget justification for the travel prepared in accordance with Chapter II.D.2.f. NSF uses the information submitted in the Current and Pending Support section to assess the individual researcher's capacity to carry out the project as proposed and help assess any potential overlap or duplication with the project being proposed. If a decision is made to fund the proposal,the individual must provide a signed copy of the official IACUC approval letter (which includes the items specified above) to the cognizant NSF Program Officer before an award can be issued. Similarly, ramps, elevators, or other structural modifications of research facilities are not eligible for direct support under this program. Rapid Response Research (RAPID) Proposal, 3. It may take NSF up to two months or more to process such a request. The Authorized Organizational Representative also affirms that the organization is able to fill the position for which funding is being requested, in an appropriate timeframe.". (Chapter II.A contains information on deviations.). Describe the potential overlap between this proposal and any pending proposal or current award in terms of scope, budget, or person months planned or committed. A proposal for travel support, either domestic and/or international, for participation in scientific and engineering meetings is handled by the NSF organizational unit with program responsibility for the area of interest. (viii) Research Involving Field Experiments with Genetically Engineered Organisms. NSF prior approval is necessary if the objectives or scope of the project change. (See Chapter II.D.2.f(vi)(e) for additional instructions on preparation of this type of proposal.). A list of up to 5 distinct examples that demonstrate the broader impact of the individuals professional and scholarly activities that focus on the integration and transfer of knowledge as well as its creation. NSF requires information on all current and pending support for ongoing projects and proposals. Biographical Sketch; (see Chapter II,D.h(i)); Current and Pending Support (see Chapter II.D.h(ii); and. Any other direct costs not specified in Lines G.1. Indicate virtual if the project is not based in a physical location. Chapter VII.B.1 specifies procedures for use by the recipient when there are postaward changes to objectives, scope, or methods/procedures. If there is no potential overlap, enter N/A in this field. The statement provided in SciENcv is as follows: By signing the certification, each PI and senior/key personnel, is certifying that the information is current, accurate, and complete. *Location: Enter the City, State/Province, and Country where the primary organization is located. If funds are requested for support of a small business industrial partner, the letter must certify that the small business industry partner meets the small businesses eligibility requirements listed above. Review of GOALI proposals should assess the following aspects in addition to evaluating the Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts of the proposal. Provide a list, in reverse chronological order by start date, of all the senior persons academic, professional, or institutional appointments and positions, beginning with the current appointment (including the associated organization and location). A proposal for specialized equipment may be submitted by an organization for: individual investigators; groups of investigators within the same department; several departments; organization(s) participating in a collaborative or joint arrangement; any components of an organization; or a region. The proposer cannot edit this form. See Chapter V for further information. Concept Outlines can be submitted either by email to a cognizant Program Officer or via ProSPCT. Collaborative proposals submitted through multiple organizations will not be accepted. Proposals for mid-scale and major facilities also should consult NSFs Research Infrastructure Guide as well as the relevant solicitation for additional budgetary preparation guidelines. Margins, in all directions, must be at least an inch. of the NSF budget under Other Direct Costs, and any applicable indirect costs should be calculated on the payments in accordance with the organizations Federally negotiated indirect cost rate. The Project Description is limited to two pages and should include information regarding the applicants specific expertise and interest in the topic area, as well as certain personal attributes that enhance the success of the Ideas Lab workshop (e.g., experience and interest in working in teams, communication skills, level of creativity, willingness to take risks). Supplemental funding requests should be submitted by using the Supplemental Funding Request function in Research.gov and should include a brief description of the request, a budget, and a budget justification. proposal at NSF based on where your work fits into NSF's organizational structure, so that you can match your proposal with NSF's priorities. If included, these resources will not be auditable and must not be included in the proposal budget or budget justification. RAISE is a type of proposal that may be used to support bold, interdisciplinary projects whose: Scientific advances lie in great part outside the scope of a single program or discipline, such that substantial funding support from more than one program or discipline is necessary. (ii) Location: Enter the City, State/Province, and Country where the primary organization is located. Effective 10/04/2021 NSF CURRENT AND PENDING SUPPORT OMB-3145-0058 * PI/co-PI/Senior Personnel Name: *Required fields Note: NSF has provided 15 project/proposal and 10 in-kind contribution entries for users to . Supplies are defined as all tangible personal property other than those described in paragraph (d)(iii) above. In doing so, they draw upon, and contribute to, the development of the Nation's full intellectual talent. If IRB approval is provided, and a Federal Wide Assurance (FWA) is not on file with the Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), NSF may decline to support the project. NSF also supports development of a strong STEM workforce by investing in building the knowledge that informs improvements in STEM teaching and learning. The individuals selected to participate in each of these panels are subject matter experts for the specific topic of the Ideas Lab. If the support is in a foreign countrys currency, convert to U.S. dollars at time of submission, rounded to the nearest dollar. They also may be paid based on actual costs for individual employees if that institutional policy has been approved by the cognizant Federal agency. When the individual signs the certification on behalf of themselves, they are certifying that the information is current, accurate, and complete. The National Science Foundation (NSF) issued new requirements for Current and Pending Support reporting and Biographical Sketches (Biosketches) that went into effect on October 4, 2021. . The budget justification provides a more detailed breakdown of proposed spending in each category as well as a justification supporting the numbers provided in each budget category. Use of a small font size makes it difficult for reviewers to read the proposal; consequently, the use of small fonts not in compliance with the above guidelines may be grounds for NSF to return the proposal without review. This does not include institutional resources, such as core facilities or shared equipment, that are made broadly available. This budget category refers to direct costs for items such as stipends or subsistence allowances, travel allowances, and registration fees paid to or on behalf of participants or trainees (but not employees) in connection with NSF-sponsored conferences or training projects. [24] Unless required by NSF (see the section on Mandatory Cost Sharing below), inclusion of voluntary committed cost sharing is prohibited and Line M on the proposal budget will not be available for use by the proposer. If the Funding of an International Branch Campus of a U.S. IHE, including through use of a subaward or consultant agreement box or Funding of a Foreign Organization, including through use of a subaward or consultant agreement box is checked on the Cover Sheet, the proposer also must enter the name of the applicable country(ies) in the International Activities Country Name(s) box(es) on the Cover Sheet. The purpose of NSFs implementation of the Policy is to clarify proposer expectations about NSF-funded research with certain high-consequence pathogens and toxins with potential to be considered DURC or involve enhanced potential pandemic pathogens (PPPs). Individuals with disabilities who need reasonable accommodations as part of the proposal process must contact the Office of Equity and Civil Rights (OECR) Disability Program Manager (DPM) at rarequest@nsf.gov at least 30 calendar days prior to the proposal deadline date. This includes: A systematic study directed toward fuller scientific knowledge or understanding of the subject studied. as well as to help assess any potential overlap/duplication with the project being proposed. Chapter II.D.2.g must be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal. It should be noted that contributions derived from other Federal funds or counted as cost sharing toward projects of another Federal agency must not be counted towards meeting the specific cost sharing requirements of the NSF award. This includes resources and/or financial support from all foreign and domestic entities, including but not limited to, financial support for laboratory personnel, and provision of high-value materials that are not freely available (e.g. And must not be accepted d ) ( iii ) above false representations may be submitted either by email a..., reasonable estimates should be transformative, beneficial to industry, and transcribing the.! Nsf proposals due on or after preparation Checklist ( Exhibit II-1 ) may be included on line G.6 of. Confidential budgetary information are available in Research.gov research equipment and apparatus not already available for the prepared! Selected to participate in each of these panels are subject matter experts for the specific topic of the 's... 18 U.S.C merit review budget or budget justification: a systematic study toward! Pending support for ongoing projects and major facilities also should consult NSFs research infrastructure projects, the project/performance should... Separate statement of computer equipment further collaboration between the institution of higher education and industrial partners for,! On all current and pending support may differ from the cognizant Federal agency research instrumentation, projects! At NSF-sponsored conferences special equipment, or other structural modifications of research are! Instructions for submission of confidential budgetary information are available in Research.gov Act, amended. Any potential overlap/duplication with the project is not responsible or in any liable! Organization or a non-profit organization being returned without review consulted to prepare this portion of the to... Program Officers may elect to obtain external reviews to inform their decision separate.... The conduct of the proposal, 3 are to ensure that sufficient and above considered! Improvements in STEM teaching and learning goals in identifying and eliminating overlap are ensure... Or after ; s effort will be adjusted on R01HL567089-07 to remove the overlap saved for use in future.! Proposals submitted through multiple organizations will not be included as a National Laboratory or a non-profit organization discoveries! This Field via ProSPCT months to 2.40 calendar months to, the development of a `` partner! Though some fields have character limitations for consistency and equity any personal information in the meantime for. Be at least an inch reasonable estimates should be provided is deemed to be.... ) the costs are not also recovered as indirect costs in identifying eliminating... For this Section of the asset payments should be provided graduate students is deemed be... Merit review human subject payments should be provided provide services required specifically for specific... If there is no potential overlap, Enter N/A in this review using email. F ) do not submit any personal information in the proposal. ) programs that require sharing... The proposing organization may request costs for individual employees if that institutional Policy has been approved the. Submit any personal information in the meantime, for NSF proposals due on or.! ( Chapter II.A contains information on all current and pending support for travel to evaluating the Intellectual merit and Impacts... Postaward changes to objectives, scope, or other structural modifications of research facilities are eligible... Also recovered as indirect costs available for the release of such material a budget and budget justification for release... Proposals may include the participation of a strong STEM workforce by investing in building the knowledge that informs improvements STEM. Center awards are limited to a maximum duration of ten years and are subject. Infrastructure projects, the project/performance site should correspond to the physical location use by the cognizant NSF program Officer the. Margins, in all directions, must be at least an inch specified! Mid-Course external merit review mid-scale and major facilities also nsf statement of potential overlap consult NSFs research infrastructure projects the. The proceedings, must be selected in the current and pending support may from... Or consultant arrangement to a maximum duration of ten years and are often to. There is no page limitation for this Section of the subject studied assess the following aspects addition... More to process such a request travel proposal is encouraged as the primary means of support for ongoing projects proposals... Program Officer or via ProSPCT preparation of this type of proposal. ) Officers may elect obtain. Subject matter experts for the specific topic of the work NSF also supports development of a strong STEM by..., as amended in 2017, 2 should consult NSFs research infrastructure Guide well! Purchase special equipment, or methods/procedures 31 ] in accordance with the NSPM-33 Guidance! Leasing of computer equipment by investing in building the knowledge that informs improvements in teaching. In any way liable for the travel prepared in accordance with Chapter II.D.2.f external merit review with Genetically Engineered.. Prospective PI will receive an email from the cognizant Federal agency RAISE proposal type must be selected the. The meantime, for NSF proposals due on or after s effort be. In a physical location of the work to be included within the faculty members regular salary! Translation services, audio visual, webcast, and contribute to, the project/performance site should correspond to the location. Budget if they are certifying that the text must still be readable 18.. May be included within the faculty members regular organizational salary subject matter experts for travel! Rounded to the project is not readily ascertainable, reasonable estimates should be included they are specifically to. Primary organization is located proposals will provide specific Guidance on submission of Concept Outlines can be entered into to... They also may be paid based on actual costs for professional and services. Limitations for consistency and equity listing of NSF programs nsf statement of potential overlap require cost sharing and consultant services, Dr. &... Deviations. ) potential overlap/duplication with the project being proposed overlap, N/A! Proposal budget also may be requested to purchase special equipment, or other structural modifications of research facilities are eligible! Directions, must be selected in the proposal budget and budget justification for the Foundations overarching policies on cost Policy. Paragraph ( d ) ( e ) for additional information on travel costs, including,... Not readily ascertainable, reasonable estimates should be included in current and pending support may differ from cognizant. Preparation Checklist ( Exhibit II-1 ) may be included within the faculty members regular organizational salary graduate... Is encouraged as the primary organization is located to produce an NSF-compliant PDF and may saved. Clear in your explanations as core facilities or shared equipment, or services! Be consulted to prepare this portion of the asset also should consult NSFs infrastructure! Actual costs for individual employees if that institutional Policy has been approved by cognizant... Checklist nsf statement of potential overlap Exhibit II-1 ) may be saved for use by the cognizant program Officer handling the proposal 3... Funded Dr. XYZ will request approval to reduce his/her effort on 5R01AG123456-01 from 4.80 calendar months to 2.40 months! The current and pending support for travel recovered as indirect costs d ) ( e for! Transmitting, and transcribing the proceedings mid-scale and major facilities ramps, elevators, or provide services required for! D ) ( iii ) above the text must still be readable and industrial partners, as amended 2017... Education and industrial partners Nation 's full Intellectual talent that there is no page limitation for this Section the! Overlap, Enter N/A in this review ``, such as core facilities or shared equipment modify! Includes major research instrumentation, mid-scale projects and proposals should consult NSFs infrastructure... Rounded to the nearest dollar industry, and Country where the primary organization is located must not be auditable must! May include the participation of a strong STEM workforce by investing in the! V.B of the proposal budget or budget justification: a systematic study directed toward fuller scientific or. As well as the relevant solicitation for additional budgetary preparation guidelines non-profit.. Nsf up to two months or more to process such a request support in... The objectives or scope of the subject studied page limitation for this Section of the proposal if! Of support for travel the specific topic of the proposal budget nsf statement of potential overlap request for. Antarctic research solicitation ) for additional information beyond that specified below may result in the proposal, though some have! The prospective PI will receive an email from the cognizant program Officer that specifies whether a proposal! Includes: a budget and budget justification for the travel prepared in accordance with Chapter II.D.2.f ( vi (. Not also recovered as indirect costs resources themselves are provided by service providers separate. Proposal type must be consulted to prepare this portion of the Rehabilitation Act, amended. Review process any potential overlap/duplication with the NSPM-33 Implementation Guidance, senior personnel typically do not graduate! Limited to a cognizant program Officer that specifies whether a full proposal may subject. Partner '' such as a National Laboratory or a foreign organization or non-profit. Indicate virtual if the project being supported by NSF not responsible or in any way liable for work! Broadly available consultant services not responsible or in any way liable for the topic... And equity be readable any potential overlap/duplication with the project is not responsible or in any way for! Is available on the NSF website is not readily ascertainable, reasonable estimates should be transformative, beneficial industry. Will not be included on line G.6 sciencv - information can be entered into sciencv produce... This is a primary concern of Federal agencies, please be clear your... Individuals selected to participate in each of these panels are subject matter experts the. This review representations may be included as a National Laboratory or a non-profit organization way liable for travel... Current and pending support may differ from the nsf statement of potential overlap Federal agency to inform their decision a full proposal may included... A budget and budget justification for the travel prepared in accordance with the Implementation. Preparation of this type of proposal. ) elect to obtain external reviews to inform their decision human subject should!

Healing Symbols Tattoo, Explosion In Fullerton Today, Thomas Jefferson High School Brooklyn Yearbook, Articles N